How the Supreme Court Helped COVID-19 Ravage Black America

How the Supreme Court Helped COVID-19 Ravage Black America

Ravage Black Americans

Epidemic 19 exposes the devastating public health and social and economic consequences of legal discrimination in the United States. For the black community in many ways, this epidemic has become a microcosm of the black experience in the United States. Centuries of military racism have threatened to reduce the risk of death in the Black Cowboy 19 while expanding the community is even more likely to live in endangered homes, working in low-wage high-risk occupations on the front line. Or having a small business that can’t access dynamic bank loans. Today, we are witnessing the real-life cost of racism in the United States.

It has long been argued that the best way to end racism in the United States is to stop talking about race. Some say that focusing on racism in the United States fuels racism and bigotry in our society. However, the COVID-19 epidemic has called into question the notion that there is a huge racial disparity in treatment, testing and mortality rates, leading to an unimaginable tragedy for black people across the United States.

In recent weeks, under the leadership of local governments, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has begun collecting identification data from individuals who can identify contacts and better understand the virus. Were testing positive for. Statistics quickly revealed that the death rate for black people was disproportionate to the percentage of their population. Epidemics have wreaked havoc in urban areas with large black populations across the country.

In St. Louis, almost all deaths attributed to COVID-19 were black. By mid-April in Chicago, blacks accounted for 70 percent of deaths. In Milwaukee County, there are more than half the cases of Calyx Cove 19. In Georgia, blacks account for 68% of hospital admissions and COVIDs for 62% of deaths. Many in-depth observers are considering that black people are more likely to be exposed to the socioeconomic risk of COVID-19 when the epidemic was in fact thought to have a large equivalent of all kinds. Is.

The media statement draws attention to the presence of friendship in poor black communities without a proper perspective on how we got to this dangerous juncture. The Covid-19 epidemic is disproportionately affecting black people. It is a legacy of the United States that has been legally approved by the United States Supreme Court.

Blacks in the United States have long relied on traditional Western medicine and medical research. Lack of trust through racially biased healthcare professionals, low insurance coverage rates, and a history of exposure to unethical race-based medical research. The combination of mistrust and discrimination results in black men having the worst health consequences of any group in the United States, due to less treatment than their white counterparts, and premature death. Is more likely.

This lack of trust presents a great storm in the face of a global epidemic that cannot be eradicated without extensive testing, treatment and cooperation with the medical community. While it is important to address this lack of trust, it is also important that we ensure that blacks are free from racial prejudice and have equal access to testing and treatment, regardless of health insurance coverage. ۔

Numerous reports from across the country highlighted stories of COVID-19 seeking tests or treatment when calls were turned away from testing centers or hospitals. Some would suggest that the effect of COVID-19 on the black community is a function of lifestyle choices such as poor diet, substance abuse, or other high-risk behaviors. This approach explores the system that is most responsible for these health problems and blames those who are legally discriminated against.

Known as civil rights cases, Scott has ruled that racial discrimination that affects or privatizes every individual is outside the scope of the Legal and Civil Rights Act. That is to say, if the owner of the pool closes the local pool because he does not want black people to have access, this discrimination is allowed because no one, including white people, is allowed to have access to it. Furthermore, the Scots have made it a rule that private entities are able to set their own rules for membership and residency, even if the rules are said to be based on race. These decisions have resulted in the direct exclusion of black people from bank financing, quality health care, general education, healthy food, and fair housing as many institutions have been privatized or relocated from black areas. Moved away. The 1976 Supreme Court decision in Washington v. Davis further complicated the fact that racial discrimination laws were legal and constitutional unless they were enacted with a discriminatory purpose.

The current public health and socio-economic crises provide an opportunity to begin the process of dismantling the legal discrimination infrastructure in the United States. If anything, this critical moment gives us a clear understanding of the far-reaching devastation caused by systemic racism that has created an environment for the virus to spread to every corner of the United States. As we begin to rid our country of this disease, we must be determined to address the root causes of the winter inequality that we are witnessing. Not only will we save lives today, but we will create a secure, healthy, and balanced future for those who are facing a legacy of legal system discrimination in all areas of American life.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *